- Public - talk.mikrotik.com.au

IP rated enclosure
by Steve Hille 24 Apr '16

24 Apr '16

Hi all, I am looking for a business that can put together an IP rated enclosure (hoping for at least IP67) for a Routerboard RB493G. It has to withstand at least 70 degrees and be mountable somehow. The environment that it will be operating in will be very mobile, hot, dusty and disgusting. RF Elements have a huge big box (Carrier class) that I can stick it in but I'm looking for something a bit smaller if possible. I would really appreciate any suggestions. Cheers,

2 1

Hotspot 2.0
by Mike Everest 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

Hi All, Anyone here know much about Hotspot 2.0? It's some kind of wireless authentication scheme that is intended to support wide area handoff between disparate and independent wifi networks that has been billed by some as a "new generation of wifi access technology" I know that some vendors, like Ruckus in particular, have made a big deal of support for this functionality, and a recent question received by our sales team prompted me to ask MT whether there were any plans to implement Hotspot 2.0 for routerOS. Who can guess their reply?? :-D Regards, Mike Everest www.duxtel.com.au 138 Station Street, Norlane Victoria, 3214, AUSTRALIA 1300-DUXTEL (+61-3-5273-4905) ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ Wholesale Distributor for MikroTik and RouterBoard in Australia and Pacific Region ISP and WISP Solutions - Hardware, Software, Training, Engineering and Support All things MikroTik - http://shop.duxtel.com.au ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ Follow our tweets for news and updates: http://twitter.com/duxtel

5 12

General Advise on AP
by Alex Samad - Yieldbroker 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

Hi I have 2 x cisco AIR-AP1042N-N-K9 I am looking at replacing these can do 1 x 2.4G and 1 x 5G. I have seen some cisco (and some homo) APS that do 1 x 2.4G and 2 x 5G with multiple antenna with MIMO. With 1G poe LAN network What would I be looking at in the ROS range to do something like that ? This is for install in ceiling A Alex Samad | Network And System Manager | Yieldbroker * +61 2 9994 2893 | ( +61 438 838 143 | * alex.samad(a)yieldbroker.com<mailto:alex.samad@yieldbroker.com> This email is confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you may have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Recipients should not forward, disclose, distribute or copy this e-mail or any attachments in whole or part without the express permission of the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where they are specifically stated to be those of Yieldbroker. Yieldbroker accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Yieldbroker can not guarantee the integrity of this communication and shall not be liable for e-mail which may be intercepted, corrupted, lost, spoofed, delayed, incomplete, or virus infected.

2 2

Re: [MT-AU Public] Public Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9
by David Ryan 20 Apr '16

20 Apr '16

Hi Mike, I know about the setting you mention when talking about normal wlan interfaces, but I cannot find an equivalent setting within capsman. It's no biggie at the moment but I will keep trying. Thanks, Dave On 19 April 2016 at 12:00, <public-request(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> wrote: > Send Public mailing list submissions to > public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > public-request(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > > You can reach the person managing the list at > public-owner(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Public digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: capsman v2 (Mike Everest) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 19:12:42 +1000 > From: "Mike Everest" <mike(a)duxtel.com> > To: "'MikroTik Australia Public List'" <public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> > Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] capsman v2 > Message-ID: <00ec01d19952$768794e0$6396bea0$(a)duxtel.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi Dave, > > If you have default-authenticate=yes on the main wlan interface profile, > then access controls might be overridden. > > Try turning off that default-authenticate option and see if that makes a > difference. You'll need to add an ACL rule to match all other clients > though, to let them authenticate also ;) > > Cheers! > > Mike. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of > David > > Ryan > > Sent: Sunday, 17 April 2016 3:49 PM > > To: public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > > Subject: [MT-AU Public] capsman v2 > > > > Howdy All, > > > > thought I would post here as I cannot seem to find "New Topic" on > > forum.mikrotik.com but that's another story. > > > > Anywho, I setup capsman V2 on 6.35 today. The CAP is also running 6.35. > > > > All is running well. I decided to try limiting AP TX speed to 512k to the > client. So I > > added an access rule. Whatever I try does not seem to work. > > > > Here is what I have so far: > > > > > > [dsryan@MikroTik] /caps-man> export > > # apr/17/2016 15:44:10 by RouterOS 6.35 > > # software id = S2JW-EBR4 > > # > > /caps-man configuration > > add country=australia datapath.bridge=capsnet distance=indoors > name=captest > > security.authentication-types=\ > > wpa2-psk security.encryption=aes-ccm > security.group-encryption=aes-ccm > > security.passphrase=qwerty123 \ > > ssid=captest > > /caps-man access-list > > add ap-tx-limit=512000 disabled=no mac-address=34:FC:EF:A9:C7:E0 ssid- > > regexp="" > > /caps-man manager > > set enabled=yes > > /caps-man provisioning > > add action=create-dynamic-enabled master-configuration=captest name- > > prefix=HAT > > > > I have a capsman V1 running at another site using an access list there > and > all is > > well. Is this a "feature" or am I having a blonde moment? > > > > Thanks, Dave. > > > > -- > > David Ryan - 0402 054 426 > > RJS Communications > > dsryan(a)rjs.com.au > > MTCNA, MTCWE, MTCRE > > _______________________________________________ > > Public mailing list > > Public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > > http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > Public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Public Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9 > ************************************* > -- David Ryan - 0402 054 426 RJS Communications dsryan(a)rjs.com.au MTCNA, MTCWE, MTCRE

2 1

PPPoE bridging via a vlan? Am I losing my mind?
by Damien Gardner Jnr 19 Apr '16

19 Apr '16

Hi Folks, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, or just losing my mind. We've finally (6 week wait) had FTTN connected at home, and as I had it connected through work, I was able to connect it the same way as my ADSL used to be - static IP with /28 routed down it. I wanted to 'simplify' my routing a little though, and instead of doing everything on my main CRS109, and using a VRF for my internal routing (to keep them separated from the DMZ, and make sure the DMZ can't route down the VPN to work, etc), I figured I'd temporarily use one of my mAP's for the internet routing. So connection was VDSL modem (Netcomm NF4V) -> port one on CRS, with ingress/egress VLAN translations to put it on vlan 99. DMZ is on vlan 101, both of which are tagged onto a port going to the mAP-2n. Configured the vlans on the ether1 on the mAP, brought up an IP to test connectivity, and I could ping the private IP of the VDSL modem. But PPPoE connection would not come up, and PPPoE scan showed nothing. Bringing up that vlan on the CRS109, and doing a PPPoE scan showed two AC's. So I then plugged the cable from the VDSL modem directly into ether2 on the mAP. And still nothing on the PPPoE scan. Put the cable back and trunked the vlan across to a routerOS VM. Nothing on PPPoE Scan. Trunked the vlan to the CRS109 in the garage - and PPPoE scan worked from there (although only showed one AC, not two) I've also tried two other VDSL modems (draytek Vigor 130, and TP-Link TD-W8977), with the same results. Have I missed something? is there a limitation in the mAP (and RouterOS for x86 for that matter?) that would stop PPPoE from working? or does PPPoE bridging need some special config on switching/vlans to let it work? Thanks, Damien -- Damien Gardner Jnr VK2TDG. Dip EE. GradIEAust rendrag(a)rendrag.net - http://www.rendrag.net/ -- We rode on the winds of the rising storm, We ran to the sounds of thunder. We danced among the lightning bolts, and tore the world asunder

4 19

capsman v2
by David Ryan 18 Apr '16

18 Apr '16

Howdy All, thought I would post here as I cannot seem to find "New Topic" on forum.mikrotik.com but that's another story. Anywho, I setup capsman V2 on 6.35 today. The CAP is also running 6.35. All is running well. I decided to try limiting AP TX speed to 512k to the client. So I added an access rule. Whatever I try does not seem to work. Here is what I have so far: [dsryan@MikroTik] /caps-man> export # apr/17/2016 15:44:10 by RouterOS 6.35 # software id = S2JW-EBR4 # /caps-man configuration add country=australia datapath.bridge=capsnet distance=indoors name=captest security.authentication-types=\ wpa2-psk security.encryption=aes-ccm security.group-encryption=aes-ccm security.passphrase=qwerty123 \ ssid=captest /caps-man access-list add ap-tx-limit=512000 disabled=no mac-address=34:FC:EF:A9:C7:E0 ssid-regexp="" /caps-man manager set enabled=yes /caps-man provisioning add action=create-dynamic-enabled master-configuration=captest name-prefix=HAT I have a capsman V1 running at another site using an access list there and all is well. Is this a "feature" or am I having a blonde moment? Thanks, Dave. -- David Ryan - 0402 054 426 RJS Communications dsryan(a)rjs.com.au MTCNA, MTCWE, MTCRE

2 1

PPTP routes
by Matt Chipman 17 Apr '16

17 Apr '16

Hi all, have router A (962UiGS-5HacT2HnT) (6.34.3) and Router B (RB951G-2Hnd) (6.35). Router B dials router A over PPTP and I added routes so B network can access A network, it all works. Problem occurs once router A reboots, it loses the static route gateway and says it is "Undefined" which then means network B cannot communicate. Selecting the dropdown box and choosing the PPTP connection (gateway) gets it all going again. If Router B reboots, the problem does not occur. I understand that the PPTP connection has disappeared which is why the gateway also goes but it seems this would be a reasonably frequent problem and should not occur. any ideas on a soulution? thanks -Matt

2 2

VRRP Priority Decrement based on route
by Dave Browning 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

Howdy, How would one decrement the priority of a VRRP interface based on something like the presence of a default route in the route table? In Cisco land (HSRP, but same difference really); track 20 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 reachability interface some interface standby 1 priority 105 standby 1 preempt standby 1 track 20 decrement 10 Cheers, Dave Dave Browning | Network Engineer P 07 3369 7666 Level 1, 12 Railway Tce, Milton QLD 4064 This email and any files transmitted with it contain confidential information for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you received this email in error please notify Sentrian Pty Ltd immediately by return email to the sender and delete the original email. We do not guarantee that this email or any attached files are free of viruses. All recipients should undertake their own virus scanning.

1 0

SSTP - Windows to RB2011
by Purdon, Bob 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi All, /sys

3 5

Re: [MT-AU Public] SSTP - Windows to RB2011
by Patrick Sayer 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

SSTP on mikrotik does not conform to the Windows standards at all. My understanding is it will not work. SSTP Mikrotik to Mikrotik works great. Try PPTP from windows to Mikrotik as this works fine (though is more often blocked by firewalls).

2 1